MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING
HO CHI MINH CITY UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND EDUCATION
FACULTY OF ECONOMICS

GRADUATION THESIS
TOPIC:

APPLYING ANTS COLONY OPTIMIZATION
ALGORITHM TO IMPROVE LABOR COST
EFFICIENCY IN BAT VINATABA TOBACCO
FIBER FACTORY
Student Name : Nguyen Ngoc To Tran
Student ID

: 21124279

Course

: 2021

Major

: Industrial Management

Advisor

: MBA. Nguyen Danh Ha Thai

Ho Chi Minh City, October 2024

ADVISOR’S COMMENTS

...

...
he content do not
fully fit the title of the
topic. The analysis is
rambling and not
detailed. There are
many
unfounded
analyses
and
comments.

The content between
chapters is linked. The
main issues to be
researched, the research
objectives, and the
content are consistent
with the topic title, but
the analysis is sketchy,
not detailed, and does
not focus on solving all
the research issues.
Some analyses and
comments lack basis.

The content between
chapters is linked. The
main issues to be
researched, the research
objectives, and the
content are consistent
with the topic name. The
analysis is detailed, and
focuses on solving the
research problems. The
analysis and comments
are well-founded.

0.5-0.6
References are not
abundant. There are no
citations
of
the
theories
(concepts)
presented in the topic.
There are many tables
that have not been
named, numbered, or
cited.

0.7-0.8
The references are quite
extensive. There are
some uncited theories
(concepts). There are
some tables that are not
named, numbered, and
fully sourced.

0.9-1.0
The reference material
is very rich. There are
full citations of the
theories
(concepts)
mentioned in the topic.
The tables are named,
numbered fully, and
have
full
sources
(except
for
tables

Point

Sentences and
words

0-0.9
The development of
ideas
is
unclear,
contradictory
and
confusing. Many errors
in word usage (not
appropriate
to
the
context). Sentences are
incoherent,
many
spelling errors.
0-0.4
Rarely contact teachers
to review assignments.

1.0-1.3
The development of
ideas is unclear and
confusing.
Many
errors in word usage
(not appropriate to the
situation). Sentences
are incoherent, many
spelling errors.

1.4-1.7
Development of ideas is
unclear. There are some
errors in word usage
(not appropriate to the
context). Sentences are
incoherent, there are
some spelling errors.

analyzed and calculated
by the author himself).
1.8-2.0
Develop ideas clearly
and coherently. Use
appropriate words for
the situation. Sentences
are coherent and free of
spelling errors.

0.5-0.6
0.7-0.8
0.9-1.0
Occasionally contact Regularly
contact Very often contact
Attitude
the teacher to review teachers to review teachers to review
the assignment.
assignments.
assignments.
Bonus points for students writing reports in English range from 0.1 to 1.0 points.

Total score:
Conclude: Allow students to defend before the council. Do not allow students to defend before the council.

Date ….month…..year ……
Lecturer marks KLTN